![]() With this approach, organizations don’t own any of the infrastructure. Sometimes known as DIY hosting, great examples of IaaS providers are typical public cloud suspects like AWS (Amazon Web Services), Microsoft Azure, or GCP (Google Cloud Platform) others include Rackspace or DigitalOcean. The next option: infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) providers. While on-premise hosting was a popular option in the early 2000s, most organizations are well on their way to the cloud. Costs here will be a mix of capital and operational expenses because of necessary hardware purchases and ongoing maintenance. In this approach, an organization will own everything: the servers, storage, networking, virtualization technology, configuration and management, monitoring, support - you get the picture. ![]() On-premise Drupal hostingĭrupal sites can be hosted in an on-premise data center or private cloud. There are quite a few options for Drupal hosting. On-premise, IaaS, and PaaS hosting: Which is right for you? A fully managed Drupal hosting platform provides the scalability, security, and support enterprises need, allowing them to focus on creating new features for customers. That’s why organizations should consider a Drupal hosting platform that’s offered as a service. As with any CMS, this can often be time-consuming and costly, leaving companies with less time and money for innovation. While the possibilities are endless with Drupal, businesses still need to support their applications with the infrastructure, security, and maintenance that their customers expect. Bonus points if a hosting option allows data to be stored in the EU or somewhere with decent data privacy laws.Drupal is a powerful, flexible open source content management system (CMS) that allows organizations to create and manage multiple websites - thousands even - and to use headless, hybrid, or traditional architectures. We might add a php library like GeoPHP to support some geospatial functions in the future.įor the moment the goal is to get up and running very quickly in a secure environment. The Dev team is one person working on a volunteer basis the site is relatively simple (maybe 5-10 or so contrib modules, a few views query overrides and UI tweaks in a glue module, etc). This is for a relatively low traffic Drupal 9 site that will be used most heavily by a small number of logged in users to track cases, input data, run simple reports in Views, etc. Though I would like to have a (simple) dev/test/prod workflow.Īnyone have thoughts on whether I should bite the bullet and learn Pantheon tools (assuming the Composer issue in #1 above has been resolved)? And/or: are there alternatives to consider? I’m not sure the added layer of complexity is worth it for such a small project. ![]() Related: Pantheon seems geared to medium to large operations with multiple devs, somewhat sophisticated devops workflow needs, etc. And as soon as I needed to install a module with external library dependencies everything got very complicated. ![]() Last time I experimented with Pantheon it seemed to be in a weird in between state where Composer could be used for some things but not others. Pantheon looks good in some ways but I have two concerns: Anyone have advice on hosting? I’m looking for a setup where I don’t have to worry about setting up a server from scratch (with the accompanying questions about security and basic performance tweaks).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |